The invisible structure behind consistency
Writers like Ryan Holiday and Oliver Burkeman have built their entire public presence on seemingly opposite poles.
People credit consistency to their success all the time.
It’s one of the most repeated mantras online in the creator space. I often get questions along the lines of “how do you manage to publish so consistently”, and I get it. On the surface it looks like discipline. But it’s really not.
If anything, it’s the opposite of how most people imagine discipline to be — a battle against resistance, a daily grind, a willpower war waged every morning at the keyboard. That’s not how I do this and that’s not how any sustainable practice is built.
What keeps people consistent is not a feeling. It’s not inspiration. It’s not force or discipline it’s a layer deeper.
What breeds consistency is structure. Invisible to most but sacred to me.
I’m not just talking about productivity but the kind of structure you design in alignment with your psychology, your energy and your life. It’s what I call alignment architecture.
You can’t see it from the outside. But it’s there. Quietly holding the shape of your work.
When I sit down to write, I don’t ask myself what I feel like doing. The structure decides. The rhythm carries me.
That’s how most people miss it. They assume consistency comes from motivation. Or discipline. Or some divine creative spark that hasn’t yet blessed them. But real consistency — the kind that builds trust, audience, income, and identity — is mechanical in its design and emotional in its outcome.
This is not just philosophy or mindset. The basal ganglia, the brain’s habit centre, responds to patterns. The simpler and more repeatable the input, the more automatic the behaviour becomes.
In other words: you don’t need more energy. You need fewer decisions.
That’s why people like Stephen King, Jerry Seinfeld, and Maya Angelou could create for decades.
Not because they had more willpower, but because they protected a repeatable container for their work.
The output was visible. The system was invisible so let’s pull back the curtain on what makes consistency sustainable especially when it come to writing.
I. The Nature of Fragmentation in Short-Form
Short-form is deceptively difficult.
It offers the illusion of freedom, like just a paragraph here, a passing thought there, a moment of clarity captured in a line or two. But in practice, it often leads to fragmentation. You feel scattered. Your ideas feel disconnected. And instead of building momentum, you find yourself constantly starting from zero.
The problem isn’t the format. It’s the frame.
Most people approach short-form like digital confetti. They throw out random thoughts into the void and hope something sticks. They call it consistency, but what they’re really practicing is incoherence. The audience doesn’t know what to expect. Neither does the writer.
Without structure, your nervous system begins to resist the act of showing up. Not because you lack discipline, but because your mind senses chaos. Each time you sit down to write, you’re entering unfamiliar terrain. No map. No thread to follow from what came before.
And the brain does not thrive in chaos. It seeks pattern, rhythm and narrative cohesion. It wants to know that today’s effort connects to yesterday’s insight and tomorrow’s potential.
When that’s missing, the work feels hollow. The process becomes tiring. And over time, you begin to internalise the wrong lesson: “Maybe I’m just not consistent enough.”
But the truth is simple and far more hopeful. You’re not inconsistent. You’re just unanchored.
Short Form vs. Long Form: Writing in Cohesion, Not Chaos
One of the hardest parts of short-form writing is making it feel coherent.
You sit down to write a Note and it sounds exactly like the one you wrote yesterday.
Or worse, it doesn’t connect to anything at all. It feels random. Scattered. Detached from the bigger story you’re trying to tell.
This is the problem most writers don’t know they have, and why so many give up.
They think they’re inconsistent, unoriginal or lacking voice.
But often, they’re just trying to write short-form content one post at a time, in fragmented states of mind, hoping it will somehow add up.
It won’t.
The solution to this is not more discipline or force or output. The solution is cohesion.
The kind of cohesion that only comes when you stop treating short-form as separate ideas, and start treating it like long-form, broken into fragments.
Think of writing Notes in a single session, once a week. That way, they share a tone, a rhythm and a pulse. They don’t repeat, they build. Like chapters in a book.
Or verses in a song that hasn’t finished yet.
Even writers like Oliver Burkeman, known for his long-form work, think in modular sequences.
He develops ideas in clusters. The clarity doesn’t come from writing more, it comes from sitting with a theme for long enough that it reveals its natural variations.
Ryan Holiday does something similar. He doesn’t write 365 random emails a year.
He writes around a core principle, then approaches it from angles.
Each piece connects to a deeper throughline. That’s what gives the work its weight.
This is what I teach in the 15-Note System:
How to create cohesion across your short-form writing.
How to pull your Notes from one deep well, not a hundred shallow ones.
And how to stay consistent not by forcing yourself to post every day, but by creating once in a rhythm that actually supports your nervous system.
Because when the work is grounded in clarity, it no longer feels like content. It feels like something you’re becoming.
II. The Invisible Structure
Structure is not a constraint.
It is what allows you to keep going when energy fades, when clarity slips, when the emotional ROI of your work hasn’t yet shown up.
Writers like Ryan Holiday and Oliver Burkeman have built their entire public presence on seemingly opposite poles. Holiday as the machine-like Stoic content engine; Burkeman as the gentle voice of anti-productivity, reminding us that time is finite and most of our goals are illusions.
And yet both of them are, quite clearly, system builders.
Holiday blocks his mornings to write. He draws from the same core well of materia daily. He turns short entries into newsletters, newsletters into books, books into a personal philosophy.
Burkeman, despite his disdain for performative productivity, writes in quiet, repetitive rhythms always circling the same existential questions. His creativity has a gravitational centre.
That’s the real lesson here: systems don’t kill creativity. They contain it. And without containment, most ideas leak out before they take form.
The same is true for Notes.
Most creators treat Notes like random thoughts scattered into the void, But rather than seeing it as a distraction from long form we need to think of it as a testing ground for ideas.
If you begin thinking of your Notes as clusters, as thematic groupings with shared emotional tone, you stop seeing them as isolated signals and start to notice the emergence of patterns.
And those patterns? They become mini chapters. Each one revealing a slightly different angle of the same core truth. Each one inviting the reader one layer deeper into your worldview.
That’s why structure matters. Not to discipline you into doing more. But to free you from the chaos of not knowing what matters.
III. The Framework I Use
My own system wasn’t born from strategy. It came from necessity. From sitting at my desk one afternoon with too many scattered thoughts, a dozen half-formed Notes, and a creeping sense that I was just making noise.
I didn’t want to post random thoughts anymore. I wanted to build something that lasted.
That’s when I started treating short form like a long-form project, written in fragments, but built with coherence.
Instead of writing from scratch each day, I started organising my Notes into clusters. Five core formats emerged, each one anchored in a different part of the self:
• Identity Anchors – who I am, what I believe, what I stand for
• Resonance Builders – emotional truths that help the reader feel seen
• Contrarian Truths – sharp provocations that challenge lazy thinking
• Personal Stories – fragments of my past that deepen connection
• Unique Insights – tools, mental models, and practical reflections
These aren’t arbitrary. They mirror how the brain receives information. Emotion first, then story, then logic. Neuroscience tells us the amygdala (emotional centre) processes stimuli before the prefrontal cortex (rational thinking). So when you build Notes that touch emotion before information, you create resonance that sticks.
The system became my scaffolding.
Each week, I would sit down and write 15 Notes. Not 15 thoughts, but 15 threads in a web, each connected to the next, loosely but deliberately. I’d map them to my formats, arrange them by tone, and let them unfold as a conversation over the week.
It became a rhythm and a kind of ritual.
Some days I had more energy than others. Some Notes did better than others. But the point wasn’t virality. The point was voice.
And over time, that voice began to attract the kind of readers who weren’t just here for dopamine, they were here to stay.
Are you ready to take action?
This is the part where most people stop.
They nod along, agree in principle, maybe even highlight a sentence or two, and then return to posting random thoughts, hoping that one of them will finally catch.
But resonance isn’t random. Voice isn’t luck. And consistency is never an accident.
It’s the result of structure. Of intention. Of deciding to treat your writing practice not as a chaotic stream, but as something cumulative, something that builds over time.
That’s what I’m building with the 15-Note System.
It’s a way of thinking, a simple, flexible rhythm for short-form writing that helps you stay aligned, visible, and creatively nourished, even in the midst of a full life.
This system is what helped me grow from obscurity to resonance. From doubt to clarity and from silence to signal.
And it can do the same for you. If this sound interesting to you DM me: 15 Note system and I will personally contact you when it’s ready.
That’s it for now.
Enjoy the rest of your day.


Very helpful. It's like The Seven Best Habits of Highly Successful People (or whatever that was), but very specific. Healthy habits mean that one needs less willpower.
This is very insightful – I'll try your suggested approach. I am struggling with the tone of notes the most. My real block is tone. The notes often come out advicey and I’m not sure which voice is genuinely mine.